These characters are of unknown sex, which may or may not ever be determined. They are elusive and mysterious, more so than even Nightwalker, and are known for projecting illusions. Nobody can get close to them, as they are far too clever to be caught. Perhaps someday someone will figure them out, but nobody has yet.
WARNING! If you are of the sort to be offended by use of pronouns for alternative genders, possibly erroneous application of gender, or use of the masculine as a neutral gender, this section of my site may not be for you! My Celtic heritage, both Irish and Scottish just plain doesn't care, as does the creative writer in me, for the simple reason that I understand the English language is not designed for a third or nonexistent gender, and both male and female are equally good and viable, IMO. Being a student, in part, of linguistics, I do not place much emphasis on escaping the boundaries of what an already-existing language can do, but rather prefer to operate within the known rules and limits of that language; this is because language is an inanimate object which is not subject to the personal sensitivities and feelings of the individual, and therefore it is futile to fight the status quo. Beyond that, I strongly object to using the term "it" to refer to an individual, human or animal, just because that seems like a rude way, in my opinion, to reference any living creature or person. Alrighty, now...I'm giving this back to Draft...
WARNING! If you are of the sort to be offended by use of pronouns for alternative genders, possibly erroneous application of gender, or use of the masculine as a neutral gender, this section of my site may not be for you! My Celtic heritage, both Irish and Scottish just plain doesn't care, as does the creative writer in me, for the simple reason that I understand the English language is not designed for a third or nonexistent gender, and both male and female are equally good and viable, IMO. Being a student, in part, of linguistics, I do not place much emphasis on escaping the boundaries of what an already-existing language can do, but rather prefer to operate within the known rules and limits of that language; this is because language is an inanimate object which is not subject to the personal sensitivities and feelings of the individual, and therefore it is futile to fight the status quo. Beyond that, I strongly object to using the term "it" to refer to an individual, human or animal, just because that seems like a rude way, in my opinion, to reference any living creature or person. Alrighty, now...I'm giving this back to Draft...